thedailyhowler

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 29 August 2013

What was John Lewis planning to say!

Posted on 11:56 by Unknown
THURSDAY, AUGUST 29, 2013

Adventures in the press corps: Can a person ever believe what he or she reads in the press?

In Monday’s Washington Post, Krissah Thompson did a 2200-word retrospective about the original March on Washington. At one point, she described the flap concerning the speech John Lewis planned to deliver that day.

This is what Thompson wrote:
THOMPSON (8/26/13): The stretched nerves began to fray the night before the march, when drafts of John Lewis's speech were circulated by members of SNCC, which hoped to generate buzz for the youngest of the day's official speakers.

In prepared remarks, Lewis threatened to "march through the South, through the heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did—nonviolently," and also criticized Kennedy's civil rights bill as being too weak. It rattled the Big 10's alliance.

Washington's Archbishop Patrick O'Boyle, who was to give the invocation at the march, said he would not speak if Lewis's speech was not altered...

Lewis chafed at O'Boyle's interference. "I didn't know him from Adam's house cat, and he probably didn't know me," Lewis says.
We’ll admit it—we were puzzled by what Thompson wrote. Since Sherman is famous for marching through the South in an extremely violent way, her account of Lewis’ planned remark didn’t quite seem to make sense.

Still, it seemed fairly clear that Thompson was quoting Lewis’ “prepared remarks.”

We were somewhat puzzled. Then we watched the Maddow Show last night. In her last segment, Rachel said this, making our hair stand on end:
MADDOW (8/28/13): The condition that Archbishop O’Boyle set on his participation of the events that day had to do with the advance text of the speech that had not been given out by Dr. King, but had been given by another speaker that day, by the youngest person scheduled to give a speech at the march that day.

According to advance copies of [John Lewis’] speech, distributed the night before the event, he was due to say that day: “We will not wait for the president, the Justice Department, nor the Congress, but we will take matters into our own hands and create a source of power outside any national structure that could and would assure us a victory."

His speech said, "We will march through the South, through the heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did. We shall pursue our own scorched earth policy."

Of course, the way Sherman marched through there was to burn down every splinter of it, right? But the archbishop said he would not appear at a march at which those words would be spoken.
Say what? That quote sounded quite a bit different!

At this point, we normally mention the old joke known as Goldberg’s Law. (The man with one watch always knows the time. The man with two watches is never quite sure.) Instead, we'll describe our search—our inevitable search for the truth, a bit of a forced march itself.

First, it’s clear that Thompson was actually quoting a recent statement by Lewis in which he paraphrased his original planned remarks. In the new PBS program, The March, the modern-day Lewis makes the quoted statement. But he’s offering a paraphrase of his 50-year-old planned remarks.

Does that mean Maddow’s account was right? Hold on there! Not so fast!

Last week, Professor Gates did a lengthy profile of Bayard Rustin’s key role in the march. Originally, the piece appeared in The Root. Midway through, the professor takes his turn quoting those planned remarks:
GATES (8/19/13): Tensions in every direction persisted. John Lewis, one of the leaders of SNCC (now a long-standing congressman from Georgia) had prepared a militant speech for the event, reading in part, "The time will come when we will not confine our marching in Washington. We will march through the South, through the Heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did. We shall pursue our own 'scorched earth' policy and burn Jim Crow to the ground—nonviolently." To appease other speakers and refrain from alienating the Kennedy administration, Rustin and Randolph had to convince Lewis to tamp it down. The quarrel continued up the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.
Gates didn’t cite O’Boyle by name. But it seems clear that he had the accurate text from Lewis' planned remarks. Various sources on the web offer this longer excerpt of the planned remarks:

“The time will come when we will not confine our marching to Washington. We will march through the South, through the heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did. We shall pursue our own scorched earth policy and burn Jim Crow to the ground—nonviolently. We shall fragment the South into a thousand pieces and put them back together in the image of democracy. We will make the action of the past few months look petty. And I say to you, WAKE UP AMERICA!”

Whatever! We can now offer our verdict on history and on the modern press corps:

Thompson bungled her report. She made it sound like she was quoting the prepared remarks.

In fact, she wasn't. Perhaps Dowd is ghosting her stuff.

Maddow’s presentation strikes us as even stranger. Why would you quote the entire spiel about conducting a scorched earth policy through the South, the way Sherman did, then leave off the one key word—“nonviolently?”

We’ll grant you—it doesn’t really make sense to add the word “nonviolently” to such a provocative image. But if you’re going to quote the statement, why would you drop that one key word at the end?

We have no idea. Maybe it was bad staff work. Having said that, let's review:

On Monday, we read the Post’s report. We’ll admit we found it puzzling.

Last night, we heard what Maddow said—and we knew we were off to the races. You simply can’t believe the things you hear from the press corps. If you want to know what’s true, you have to engage in a very rough version of Walker Percy’s search.

What Walker Percy may have said: What Walker Percy may have said is shown below. We think this is a real quote:

“The search is what anyone would undertake if he were not sunk in the everydayness of his own life. To become aware of the possibility of the search is to be onto something. Not to be onto something is to be in despair.”

Percy is said to have said that a long time ago. Even before we had cable!

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On Birmingham’s most famous Sunday!
    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 What two ministers said: Yesterday was the fiftieth anniversary of Birmingham’s most famous Sunday. As many peop...
  • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
    SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2013 What should the Post have written: Kevin Drum almost always loses us when he starts talking semantics. This doesn’...
  • The end of an era at the Times!
    FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2013 After the Dowdism crept: This memoir in yesterday’s New York Times reads like a bit of a parody. It ran on the f...
  • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 Forgets to tell us how much: Remember when dentists would recommend sugarless gum to their patients who chewed gu...
  • Roxane Gay mocks “wealth porn” in the Times!
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Then quickly breaks our hearts: According to Nexis, the term “wealth porn” does not enjoy a rich history. Wit...
  • The laziness of the New York Times!
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2013 Adam Nagourney, lounging around in L.A.: Very few women hold office in Los Angeles city and county government. By ...
  • Hanna Rosin corrects an inaccurate claim!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 We liberals decide to fight back: Last Friday, Hanna Rosen corrected an inaccurate claim—an inaccurate claim tha...
  • The Times reports why Christine Quinn lost!
    FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 Nobody cares about issues: Yesterday, Gail Collins tried to explain why Bill de Blasio rolled to victory in this...
  • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
    MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 The two Australian miracles: There are certain facts you hear all the time. Other facts which are very basic will g...
  • Lawrence interviews Anthony Weiner!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 The end of the human race: Last night, Lawrence made us think of Norman O. Brown again. Brown, a well-regarded ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ▼  August (70)
      • What Dr. King would be doing today!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: We get little help from our ...
      • Our leadership is astoundingly weak!
      • What was John Lewis planning to say!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: A slight condescension!
      • American Experience: Remarkable people who once wa...
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: Was Dr. King right?
      • Finally, Milbank starts to explain!
      • A horrible front-page report by the Post!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: The toy of race!
      • IN RE Clinton foundation, the Post gets it right!
      • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
      • Debunking another blunder by Dowd!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: What holds us back?
      • Rachel Maddow may have gotten it right!
      • What the heck is a misquotation?
      • RODEO CLOWNS: From Rush to Crump!
      • Is yawning contagious from people to dogs?
      • Hockey breaks out on the Times op-ed page!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: Blackface, she said!
      • As usual, Chris Matthews has flipped!
      • Three cheers for the Washington Post!
      • Maureen Dowd parses the Clintons’ bad works!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: And a tow truck driver!
      • Erin Burnett and the bear/shark attacks!
      • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
      • Maureen Dowd gobbles the big nothingburger!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: No trains lead to Finland!
      • What is Bill Keller talking about!
      • Maureen Dowd dreams of the Lincoln Bedroom!
      • How regular people behave at the circus!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: And cable news hosts!
      • In our view, Krugman goes over the line!
      • This is how silly reporting can be!
      • Concerning those international scores, Motoko Rich...
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Muckrakers down!
      • Chris Hayes has the latest on white people!
      • Jill Lawrence sings the guild’s memorized tales!
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Did Elisabeth Rosenthal actually s...
      • Which news orgs was Maddow talking about?
      • How well does the Washington Post explain schools?
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Nothing to look at, the author said!
      • Anatomy of a cable news crash!
      • There was a large house on Nantucket!
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: The silence continues!
      • Was that a smart thing for Chris Hayes to do?
      • Times readers just keep pummeling Dowd!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Skill-less in Cincinnati!
      • How blacks view weiner, plus alleged drops in scores!
      • The end of an era at the Times!
      • Ezra Klein refuses to stop!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: The fiery liberals this time!
      • Changes in NAEP scores under Bloomberg!
      • The laziness of the New York Times!
      • Gail Collins, straight outta Joyce!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: The New York Times fails the...
      • Enduring values of the Times!
      • What does it mean to be colonized!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Lehrer and the (compliant) p...
      • The values of the New York Times!
      • Explaining the silence of the logicians!
      • The New York Times is a real piece of work!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Our own Rush!
      • Movers and shakers [HEART] Larry Summers!
      • The public is tired of Maureen Dowd’s works!
      • Intellectual paralysis may look like this!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Of our paralysis!
      • DUBLINERS TOO: Skolnik's “mythical garment!”
      • Chris Matthews is having an episode!
      • DUBLINERS TOO: The liberals this time!
    • ►  July (80)
    • ►  June (78)
    • ►  May (79)
    • ►  April (82)
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile