thedailyhowler

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 7 August 2013

What does it mean to be colonized!

Posted on 08:50 by Unknown
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2013

Judy and Gwen get the nod: What does it mean to be colonized?

In part, it means you’re forced to listen to hoary old tales from a hoary old ruling elite. It means you'll see your nation's professors pretend that these stories make sense. See our previous post.

But you can be colonized other ways too! For one example, read this morning’s New York Times concerning Gwen and Judy.

Ascot-kissing Brian Stelter encourages us to be thrilled because of a wonderful breakthrough. Two women will finally broadcast the news!

But look who those two women are.

When we think of Gwen, we remember the time she forgot to ask the key question of Condi Rice in July 2003, in the immediate aftermath of the breakdown in Iraq. Weeks later, we saw Tice and Ifill fawning to each other at a Dallas convention, with Rice mentioning the way she and Gwen get together for home-cooked meals.

When we think of Judy, we still think of two events from Campaign 2000. We think of the astonishing question with which she opened the last Gore-Bradley debate in New Hampshire, with a great deal on the line. A bit more comically, we remember the way she toughed it out as she spoke with Gail Collins on CNN's Inside Politics.

Plagiarizing Jacob Weisberg, Collins had savaged Gore’s performance in the first Gore-Bradley debate. In fairness, everyone else had plagiarized Weisberg and said these same things, so we can’t fault Collins alone.

But uh-oh! Four days had passed, and it was clear that New Hampshire Democrats hadn’t seen the debate that way. They thought Gore and Bradley had both done well—so Collins pulled an amazing flip, with Judy playing along:
WOODRUFF (11/2/99): What matters to voters at this stage of an election?

COLLINS: It's sort of a very beginning getting to know who the candidates are. I think they want to know which candidates are serious enough that it's worth their bother to pay attention to them, which of them agree with them on the most broad kind of visions of, you know, the way the country ought to be going, and frankly which ones are personally attractive to them, which ones seem like guys that they wouldn't get tired of if they had them in their face for the next four years.

WOODRUFF: Well, given that, when you look back at last week's town meeting with Gore and Bradley, how did they come across?

COLLINS: You know, I thought—I actually tend to think Gore did better than a lot of people did at the time. He seemed real energetic. He seemed to really care. He seemed to really want people to like him. And voters, I think, like that sense that a politician is really trying to please them.
Collins “actually tended to think Gore did better than a lot of people did at the time.” And that was odd, because one of those people at the time had been Gail Collins herself!

“At the time,” Collins wrote this about Gore's performance, which now seemed real energetic:
COLLINS (10/29/99): Al Gore has a personality without a thermostat, and when he tries to look animated he practically crashes into the wallboard. On Wednesday he hijacked the auditorium early on, begging for a chance to do a pre-debate Q.-and-A. ("This person has a question! Do we have time for his question?") He tossed in a little Spanish and a long joke, and made endless attempts to create Clintonesque mind-melds with the audience. ("How old is your child, Corey? . . . Are you unionized, Earl?") At the end, he refused to be dragged offstage. ("Can I say one more word? I would like to stay!") He bore an uncomfortable resemblance to the kid who asks the teacher for more homework. Mr. Bradley, lounging on his stool, arms folded across his chest, looked like the high school athlete watching the class nerd volunteer to stay and clap erasers.
So you’ll know, “Corey” was a young woman with a sick child. “At the time,” Collins had ridiculed Gore for inquiring about this child’s health. As Weisberg had said in the plagiarized piece, this misconduct showed that Gore was trying to be Just Like Clinton!

“At the time,” Collins mocked Gore for asking about a sick child. Four days later, looking back, he had “seemed to really care.”

If Woodruff was prepared at all, she knew that Collins had written that column. Four days later, she let the flip go. The guild will always do that.

What does it mean to be colonized? This morning, the Times invites us to thrill at Woodruff’s ascension. We’ll get two women reading the news!

Never mind who they are.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On Birmingham’s most famous Sunday!
    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 What two ministers said: Yesterday was the fiftieth anniversary of Birmingham’s most famous Sunday. As many peop...
  • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
    SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2013 What should the Post have written: Kevin Drum almost always loses us when he starts talking semantics. This doesn’...
  • The end of an era at the Times!
    FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2013 After the Dowdism crept: This memoir in yesterday’s New York Times reads like a bit of a parody. It ran on the f...
  • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 Forgets to tell us how much: Remember when dentists would recommend sugarless gum to their patients who chewed gu...
  • Roxane Gay mocks “wealth porn” in the Times!
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Then quickly breaks our hearts: According to Nexis, the term “wealth porn” does not enjoy a rich history. Wit...
  • The laziness of the New York Times!
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2013 Adam Nagourney, lounging around in L.A.: Very few women hold office in Los Angeles city and county government. By ...
  • Hanna Rosin corrects an inaccurate claim!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 We liberals decide to fight back: Last Friday, Hanna Rosen corrected an inaccurate claim—an inaccurate claim tha...
  • The Times reports why Christine Quinn lost!
    FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 Nobody cares about issues: Yesterday, Gail Collins tried to explain why Bill de Blasio rolled to victory in this...
  • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
    MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 The two Australian miracles: There are certain facts you hear all the time. Other facts which are very basic will g...
  • Lawrence interviews Anthony Weiner!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 The end of the human race: Last night, Lawrence made us think of Norman O. Brown again. Brown, a well-regarded ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ▼  August (70)
      • What Dr. King would be doing today!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: We get little help from our ...
      • Our leadership is astoundingly weak!
      • What was John Lewis planning to say!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: A slight condescension!
      • American Experience: Remarkable people who once wa...
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: Was Dr. King right?
      • Finally, Milbank starts to explain!
      • A horrible front-page report by the Post!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: The toy of race!
      • IN RE Clinton foundation, the Post gets it right!
      • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
      • Debunking another blunder by Dowd!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: What holds us back?
      • Rachel Maddow may have gotten it right!
      • What the heck is a misquotation?
      • RODEO CLOWNS: From Rush to Crump!
      • Is yawning contagious from people to dogs?
      • Hockey breaks out on the Times op-ed page!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: Blackface, she said!
      • As usual, Chris Matthews has flipped!
      • Three cheers for the Washington Post!
      • Maureen Dowd parses the Clintons’ bad works!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: And a tow truck driver!
      • Erin Burnett and the bear/shark attacks!
      • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
      • Maureen Dowd gobbles the big nothingburger!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: No trains lead to Finland!
      • What is Bill Keller talking about!
      • Maureen Dowd dreams of the Lincoln Bedroom!
      • How regular people behave at the circus!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: And cable news hosts!
      • In our view, Krugman goes over the line!
      • This is how silly reporting can be!
      • Concerning those international scores, Motoko Rich...
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Muckrakers down!
      • Chris Hayes has the latest on white people!
      • Jill Lawrence sings the guild’s memorized tales!
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Did Elisabeth Rosenthal actually s...
      • Which news orgs was Maddow talking about?
      • How well does the Washington Post explain schools?
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Nothing to look at, the author said!
      • Anatomy of a cable news crash!
      • There was a large house on Nantucket!
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: The silence continues!
      • Was that a smart thing for Chris Hayes to do?
      • Times readers just keep pummeling Dowd!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Skill-less in Cincinnati!
      • How blacks view weiner, plus alleged drops in scores!
      • The end of an era at the Times!
      • Ezra Klein refuses to stop!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: The fiery liberals this time!
      • Changes in NAEP scores under Bloomberg!
      • The laziness of the New York Times!
      • Gail Collins, straight outta Joyce!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: The New York Times fails the...
      • Enduring values of the Times!
      • What does it mean to be colonized!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Lehrer and the (compliant) p...
      • The values of the New York Times!
      • Explaining the silence of the logicians!
      • The New York Times is a real piece of work!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Our own Rush!
      • Movers and shakers [HEART] Larry Summers!
      • The public is tired of Maureen Dowd’s works!
      • Intellectual paralysis may look like this!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Of our paralysis!
      • DUBLINERS TOO: Skolnik's “mythical garment!”
      • Chris Matthews is having an episode!
      • DUBLINERS TOO: The liberals this time!
    • ►  July (80)
    • ►  June (78)
    • ►  May (79)
    • ►  April (82)
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile