thedailyhowler

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 23 August 2013

What the heck is a misquotation?

Posted on 09:46 by Unknown
FRIDAY, AUGUST 23, 2013

Disputatious minds don’t want to know: Maureen Dowd has generated quite a few fake quotations down through the years.

Usually, she can at least explain where she was when the fake quotation didn’t occur. In Wednesday’s column, she wasn’t even sure about that.

Did she talk to Bill de Blasio’s wife at the Good Times coffee shop, the Good Stuff Diner or perhaps at the Good Vibrations tanning salon? Given Dowd’s postmodernist lean, it’s very hard to be sure.

Still, we were surprised by commenters at several sites who disputed the claim that Dowd had actually misquoted Chirlane McCray. What Dowd wrote was close enough, quite a few commenters seemed inclined to say.

Did Maureen Dowd misquote McCray? Let’s consider what a “quotation” is.

Instead of reporting what de Blasio said, Dowd decided to focus on his wife, who isn’t actually running for mayor but seems to be way too black. Below, you see the text of what McCray said in the exchange which later came into question.

McCray was asked why Christine Quinn isn’t faring better with woman voters. According to the New York Times, this is what she said:
MCCRAY: Well, I am a woman, and she is not speaking to the issues I care about, and I think a lot of women feel the same way. I don’t see her speaking to the concerns of women who have to take care of children at a young age or send them to school and after school, paid sick days, workplace, she is not speaking to any of those issues. What can I say?

And she is not accessible, she is not the kind of person who you can talk to and go up to and have a conversation with about those things, and I suspect that other women feel the same thing I’m feeling.
Dowd could have chosen to paraphrase that statement. Instead, she used quotation marks. Here’s what she wrote in her original column:
DOWD (8/21/13): Asked why Quinn was not rallying women, McCray, a mother of two, replied: “She’s not accessible. She’s not the kind of person I feel I can go up to and talk to about issues like taking care of children at a young age and paid sick leave.”
Even judged as a paraphrase, we’d call that lousy work. McCray’s main point concerned Quinn’s alleged failure to discuss key issues. Dowd stressed McCray’s secondary point, the claim that Quinn isn’t accessible.

In our view, Dowd’s presentation would be very shaky even judged as a paraphrase. But it doesn’t even come close to being a quotation.

Once you open quotation marks, the words which follow should be the exact words the person said, with minor allowances for minor housekeeping matters. You don’t have to write down “um.” If someone stumbles over a word, you don’t have to record that.

Dowd re-scrambled McCray’s statement in major ways. As paraphrase, it’s very weak. But it simply isn’t a quotation.

Such distinctions hugely matter. The press corps has done lots of harm in recent decades through the use of inaccurate quotation and through inventive paraphrase.

We’d say the most consequential example of each came from Campaign 2000 (winners below). But other campaigns have been affected by bad quotes and bogus paraphrase. Editors ought to be very strict about such basic practices.

Cogitate and discuss: When McCray made her actual statement, she didn’t say anything about being “a mother of two.” Dowd inserted that factoid right before she “quoted” McCray’s reinvented statement.

Should Dowd have done that?

Dowd’s statement that McCray is “a mother of two” is technically accurate, of course. But it helped fuel the sense that McCray was snarking about the fact that Quinn doesn’t have children.

Should Dowd have positioned that factoid there? Very clearly, we’d say no.

Cogitate and discuss.

Most consequential “mistakes:” Most consequential misquotation of the last several decades:

“I was the one that started it all.” Attributed to Candidate Gore, 11/30/99.

(Ceci Connolly and Katharine Seelye accidentally misheard that first word, though totally not on purpose. Once the misquotation was definitively corrected, they simply found another way to pretend that Gore had misspoken. This revived the dying "Al Gore is the world’s biggest liar" theme, which was dying from a lack of examples. The punishing theme dominated the rest of the 2000 campaign.)

Most consequential inventive paraphrase:

Al Gore said he invented the Internet! Repeated by every guild member.

(Rather quickly, this paraphrase started appearing inside quotation marks. In this way, an inventive paraphrase was transformed into a misquotation.)

Those “errors” by the national press corps changed the course of world history. If it turns out that UFOs were involved, The History Channel will tell us.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On Birmingham’s most famous Sunday!
    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 What two ministers said: Yesterday was the fiftieth anniversary of Birmingham’s most famous Sunday. As many peop...
  • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
    SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2013 What should the Post have written: Kevin Drum almost always loses us when he starts talking semantics. This doesn’...
  • The end of an era at the Times!
    FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2013 After the Dowdism crept: This memoir in yesterday’s New York Times reads like a bit of a parody. It ran on the f...
  • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 Forgets to tell us how much: Remember when dentists would recommend sugarless gum to their patients who chewed gu...
  • Roxane Gay mocks “wealth porn” in the Times!
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Then quickly breaks our hearts: According to Nexis, the term “wealth porn” does not enjoy a rich history. Wit...
  • The laziness of the New York Times!
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2013 Adam Nagourney, lounging around in L.A.: Very few women hold office in Los Angeles city and county government. By ...
  • Hanna Rosin corrects an inaccurate claim!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 We liberals decide to fight back: Last Friday, Hanna Rosen corrected an inaccurate claim—an inaccurate claim tha...
  • The Times reports why Christine Quinn lost!
    FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 Nobody cares about issues: Yesterday, Gail Collins tried to explain why Bill de Blasio rolled to victory in this...
  • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
    MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 The two Australian miracles: There are certain facts you hear all the time. Other facts which are very basic will g...
  • Lawrence interviews Anthony Weiner!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 The end of the human race: Last night, Lawrence made us think of Norman O. Brown again. Brown, a well-regarded ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ▼  August (70)
      • What Dr. King would be doing today!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: We get little help from our ...
      • Our leadership is astoundingly weak!
      • What was John Lewis planning to say!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: A slight condescension!
      • American Experience: Remarkable people who once wa...
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: Was Dr. King right?
      • Finally, Milbank starts to explain!
      • A horrible front-page report by the Post!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: The toy of race!
      • IN RE Clinton foundation, the Post gets it right!
      • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
      • Debunking another blunder by Dowd!
      • EPISTEMIC ENCLOSURES: What holds us back?
      • Rachel Maddow may have gotten it right!
      • What the heck is a misquotation?
      • RODEO CLOWNS: From Rush to Crump!
      • Is yawning contagious from people to dogs?
      • Hockey breaks out on the Times op-ed page!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: Blackface, she said!
      • As usual, Chris Matthews has flipped!
      • Three cheers for the Washington Post!
      • Maureen Dowd parses the Clintons’ bad works!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: And a tow truck driver!
      • Erin Burnett and the bear/shark attacks!
      • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
      • Maureen Dowd gobbles the big nothingburger!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: No trains lead to Finland!
      • What is Bill Keller talking about!
      • Maureen Dowd dreams of the Lincoln Bedroom!
      • How regular people behave at the circus!
      • RODEO CLOWNS: And cable news hosts!
      • In our view, Krugman goes over the line!
      • This is how silly reporting can be!
      • Concerning those international scores, Motoko Rich...
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Muckrakers down!
      • Chris Hayes has the latest on white people!
      • Jill Lawrence sings the guild’s memorized tales!
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Did Elisabeth Rosenthal actually s...
      • Which news orgs was Maddow talking about?
      • How well does the Washington Post explain schools?
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: Nothing to look at, the author said!
      • Anatomy of a cable news crash!
      • There was a large house on Nantucket!
      • EYES WIDE SHUT: The silence continues!
      • Was that a smart thing for Chris Hayes to do?
      • Times readers just keep pummeling Dowd!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Skill-less in Cincinnati!
      • How blacks view weiner, plus alleged drops in scores!
      • The end of an era at the Times!
      • Ezra Klein refuses to stop!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: The fiery liberals this time!
      • Changes in NAEP scores under Bloomberg!
      • The laziness of the New York Times!
      • Gail Collins, straight outta Joyce!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: The New York Times fails the...
      • Enduring values of the Times!
      • What does it mean to be colonized!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Lehrer and the (compliant) p...
      • The values of the New York Times!
      • Explaining the silence of the logicians!
      • The New York Times is a real piece of work!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Our own Rush!
      • Movers and shakers [HEART] Larry Summers!
      • The public is tired of Maureen Dowd’s works!
      • Intellectual paralysis may look like this!
      • SOURCES OF PARALYSIS: Of our paralysis!
      • DUBLINERS TOO: Skolnik's “mythical garment!”
      • Chris Matthews is having an episode!
      • DUBLINERS TOO: The liberals this time!
    • ►  July (80)
    • ►  June (78)
    • ►  May (79)
    • ►  April (82)
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile