thedailyhowler

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 7 June 2013

Sean and Newt continue the scam!

Posted on 08:44 by Unknown
FRIDAY, JUNE 7, 2013

Continuing! The dreck of the 157: Last evening, just a few minutes in, Sean Hannity continued the scam.

He feels no fear of correction or challenge from any high-profile news org. For that reason, he and Newt kept discussing Douglas Shulman’s deeply troubling, non-existent visits to the White House.

To watch the scam continue, click here:
HANNITY (6/6/13): What did you make of the transcripts? Because the narrative has been that the people responsible were in Cincinnati. Rogue agents. But the transcripts, they said they were directed by Washington. What do you think of that?

GINGRICH: I believe that the Obama administration has been even more dishonest about the Internal Revenue scandal than it has been about Benghazi and it’s been almost completely dishonest about Benghazi. When you learn, for example, that the commissioner of Internal Revenue visited the White House 157 times, more than the attorney general, more than the secretary of state, more than any cabinet officer, 157 times, you have to ask yourself, “What were they talking about? What were they meeting on?”

His answer, which tells you the contempt he has for the Congress, was, “Well, one of them was going to the White House Easter egg roll.” Well, you know, that is the kind of contempt for the American people that should not exist in somebody who holds public office.
On Fox, they know they can keep repeating those bogus assertions. They know that MSNBC will only pretend to fight back, if they even do that.

They know that big mainstream orgs like the Washington Post and the New York Times will continue to look away as they deceive the American people.

On Fox, they will continue to fight. MSNBC will not fight back, although they will pretend.

This is the way average voters get conned. They get conned with the acquiescence of MSNBC, the New York Times and the Washington Post.

The Wreck of the Old 97: The Wreck of the Old 97 is famous. Everyone from Woody Guthrie to Boxcar Willie had sung about this wreck.

To study the famous old lyrics, click this. To learn from the leading authority on this subject, we'll suggest that you just click here.

Will there ever be a ballad called The Wreck of the 157? From the perspective of Fox, there would seem to be little to fear.

You have to ask yourself, “What were they talking about? What were they meeting on?” On Fox, they know they can keep pounding away at Shulman’s snarky remark about the Easter egg roll.

They know no one will mention the other things Shuman said when he appeared before the House—for example, when he spoke with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

On this day, Republicans unveiled the claim that Shulman had made a shitload of visits to the White House. They used the number 118, referring to the years 2010 and 2011.

To Shulman, that number just didn't sound right. As always, Jordan was wrong:
JORDAN (5/22/13): Mr. Shulman, real quick follow-up. The 118 times you were in the White House in 2010, 2011, who were you meeting with?

SHULMAN: I'm— First of all, I'm not familiar with that—

JORDAN: Straight from the White House log.

SHULMAN: —and I’m assuming that it counts when I go to OMB, which is, you know, the budget office, for resources, etc.

JORDAN: No, it counts when you go to the White House. That’s what I, that’s what it was. Times you’ve been at the White House. That’s when it counts. So, who did you meet with?
As usual, Jordan was wrong. Shulman’s instinct was right.

The number of meetings being bruited now stands at 157. But the vast majority of those meetings did not take place at the White House. Nor does anyone actually know how many Shulman attended.

Why do Newt and Sean keep saying those things? Because they know they won’t be corrected or fact-checked or challenged.

As Shulman continued, he explained the nature of the meetings he attended. On Fox, they still pretend to be baffled about the nature of those meetings. But this is what Shulman said two weeks ago, speaking under oath:
SHULMAN (continuing directly): I, I met with a variety of people—

JORDAN: Is there somebody main, or is it— What was the main subject you talked about? You, you talk about 118 different things, or was it just kind of some themes and focus?

SHULMAN: The themes of things I would have talked to people at the White House about would have been our budget, would have been about tax policy, fiscal cliff. Would have been about streamlining the FASFA—the financial aid application. Would have been when the tax for airport—

JORDAN: Did you talk about the implementation— Did you talk about the implementation of the Affordable Care Act?

SHULMAN: Implementation of the Affordable Care Act would have been one of the themes, and there could have been more. I don't— I'm not prepared to give you an exhaustive list.

JORDAN: Which, which one used— Which one consumed the most of your time of those subjects you just listed?

SHULMAN: Probably budget, general tax policy, and the Affordable Care Act.
Later that day, speaking with Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Shulman again challenged “the premise of there were 118 visits to the White House.”

On Fox, they keep saying that Shulman attended 157 meetings at the White House. They keep implying that he gave just that one weird explanation.

They do this because they know they won’t be challenged or corrected by any mainstream news org.

Are they concerned about MSNBC? In their place, would you be concerned?

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On Birmingham’s most famous Sunday!
    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 What two ministers said: Yesterday was the fiftieth anniversary of Birmingham’s most famous Sunday. As many peop...
  • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
    SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2013 What should the Post have written: Kevin Drum almost always loses us when he starts talking semantics. This doesn’...
  • The end of an era at the Times!
    FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2013 After the Dowdism crept: This memoir in yesterday’s New York Times reads like a bit of a parody. It ran on the f...
  • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 Forgets to tell us how much: Remember when dentists would recommend sugarless gum to their patients who chewed gu...
  • Roxane Gay mocks “wealth porn” in the Times!
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Then quickly breaks our hearts: According to Nexis, the term “wealth porn” does not enjoy a rich history. Wit...
  • The laziness of the New York Times!
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2013 Adam Nagourney, lounging around in L.A.: Very few women hold office in Los Angeles city and county government. By ...
  • Hanna Rosin corrects an inaccurate claim!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 We liberals decide to fight back: Last Friday, Hanna Rosen corrected an inaccurate claim—an inaccurate claim tha...
  • The Times reports why Christine Quinn lost!
    FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 Nobody cares about issues: Yesterday, Gail Collins tried to explain why Bill de Blasio rolled to victory in this...
  • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
    MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 The two Australian miracles: There are certain facts you hear all the time. Other facts which are very basic will g...
  • Lawrence interviews Anthony Weiner!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 The end of the human race: Last night, Lawrence made us think of Norman O. Brown again. Brown, a well-regarded ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (80)
    • ▼  June (78)
      • Why won’t the Times report Beastie Boy’s age!
      • A massive improvement over last year!
      • Daring to struggle, daring to win!
      • Public schools: You’ve been told a false story aga...
      • INVENTING THE OTHER: You may have a bias against r...
      • Diogenes seeks a cable analyst!
      • How crazy was the court’s Voting Rights decision?
      • Claims you can hear while watching Fox!
      • INVENTING THE OTHER: Paula Deen said she invented ...
      • Timesman mourns the decline in English majors!
      • Who is the horrible Prachi Gupta?
      • Tanner Colby wins the prize!
      • INVENTING THE OTHER: Serena's all wrong!
      • Where do phony “hero tales” come from!
      • Gregory asked a peculiar question!
      • We invite Coates to take The Challenge!
      • INVENTING THE OTHER: Salon invents Kurtz!
      • At CNN, Howard Kurtz will call it a day!
      • The very concept of trivia doesn’t exist!
      • Background report: Inventing The Other!
      • INVENTING THE OTHER: Liberally loathing!
      • Maddow makes fools of her viewers, part 2!
      • Chris Hayes says he is seething with anger!
      • SILLY SEASON: Who gets attacked!
      • Maddow makes fools of her viewers, part 1!
      • Niall Ferguson just keeps pouring it on!
      • SILLY SEASON: Greatest teen bimbos of the past!
      • Coates keeps offering original thoughts!
      • Glenn Kessler and his editors may need a good rest!
      • The case of the unreimbursed body wash!
      • SILLY SEASON: Killing the pig in a shark attack!
      • Breaking: Where The Professors Are!
      • Maddow massively jumps the shark!
      • Alessandra Stanley gets it right!
      • SILLY SEASON: Miss Utah attacked by gang of sharks!
      • Jonathan Bernstein captures the culture!
      • An excellent journey to Dreamland!
      • The Times reports on “ability grouping!”
      • TWO KINDS OF FACTS: A commenter’s wish for the pub...
      • TWO KINDS OF FACTS: Speaking of American children!
      • Weiner says he invented the Internet!
      • Jonah Lehrer is back in the saddle again!
      • The New York Times explains cherry-picking!
      • Confirming: Bamford’s report was completely ignored!
      • TWO KINDS OF FACTS: Some basic facts which are alw...
      • Walter Pincus describes the way our world works!
      • Issa and Christie don't care about Drum!
      • Maureen and Lawrence are smelling a scandal!
      • TWO KINDS OF FACTS: Amazing errors concerning the ...
      • Bernays refuses to break from the tribe!
      • Those Skittles really aren’t part of the trial!
      • The Washington Post won’t criticize Fox!
      • TWO KINDS OF FACTS: Hacker and Dreifus make a very...
      • Politifact fact-checks (almost) everyone!
      • The Post prints a truly remarkable document!
      • Two names you ought to be thinking about!
      • TWO KINDS OF FACTS: Invented, withheld!
      • Should David Sirota be saying this thing?
      • Sean and Newt continue the scam!
      • WHAT’S WRONG WITH MSNBC: With tape of adorable pen...
      • Gail Collins wants preschool education!
      • John Dickerson doesn’t know how to read!
      • Cable host Bill O’Reilly self-corrects!
      • WHAT’S WRONG WITH MSNBC: This!
      • Speaking of test scores, Josh Rogin can’t read!
      • Our test scores are better. Our journalists aren’t!
      • Already, those conventions are a thing of the past!
      • It’s time for Glenn Kessler to fact-check O’Reilly!
      • WHAT’S WRONG WITH MSNBC: Pareene speaks!
      • Continuing: There are no facts anywhere in the land!
      • There are no facts anywhere in this land!
      • Naming Candy Crowley by name, O’Donnell breaks cod...
      • WHAT’S WRONG WITH MSNBC: The New York Times asks!
      • At long last, Dowd writes about welfare reform!
      • The gang that can’t even mock Bachmann straight!
      • WHAT’S WRONG WITH MSNBC: Good God!
      • At long last, the New York Times bends to our will!
      • The wages of the refusal to fight is a drop in one...
    • ►  May (79)
    • ►  April (82)
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile