thedailyhowler

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 12 April 2013

This crap has gone on for a very long time!

Posted on 09:14 by Unknown
FRIDAY, APRIL 12, 2013

Gail Collins, way back when: Gail Collins has been awful for a very long time.

Everyone has accepted her work. This should not have been done.

Way back in 1999, Collins already liked her animal farm (see our previous post). She also understood the prevailing mood in the Clinton-hating press corps.

In June 1999, Candidate Gore made his formal announcement—he was running for president. Everyone else was trashing Gore, so this horrible person did too:
COLLINS (6/21/99): The new Al Gore yells quite a lot. Caught between Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, two natural campaigners, the Vice President is trying to make up in decibels what he lacks in spontaneity. "I am not satisfied! INDEED I AM RESTLESS!" he cried in New York, announcing his candidacy for President with a list of promises about what he would do to move the country TOWARD AMERICA'S NEW HORIZONS, a goal that will involve eliminating EVERY LAST DIME OF WASTE, fighting GLOBAL WARMING and making our public schools THE FINEST AND BEST IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.

This is our fault. We have been carping about how boring Al Gore is, and the poor man is all but howling at the moon in an effort to sound more compelling. We are being forced to watch him go through an enormous effort to look effortless, and it is as discomfiting as looking at the underside of a swan swimming on the lake. Voters are not going to elect a President who makes them feel like nervous parents at the second-grade class play. Mr. Gore has to give up this futile attempt to become Kennedyesque and embrace the boredom.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! The highly ridiculous Candidate Gore was yelling too loud about climate change! And yuck!

All that yelling made Collins picture the underside of a swan!

In late October, Gore and Bradley held their first Democratic debate. As we have said and explained in the past, we think the following part of Collins’ Gore-trashing column is one of the most heartless things we’ve ever seen from this press corps:
COLLINS (10/29/99): Al Gore has a personality without a thermostat, and when he tries to look animated he practically crashes into the wallboard. On Wednesday he hijacked the auditorium early on, begging for a chance to do a pre-debate Q.-and-A. ("This person has a question! Do we have time for his question?") He tossed in a little Spanish and a long joke, and made endless attempts to create Clintonesque mind-melds with the audience. ("How old is your child, Corey? . . . Are you unionized, Earl?") At the end, he refused to be dragged offstage. ("Can I say one more word? I would like to stay!") He bore an uncomfortable resemblance to the kid who asks the teacher for more homework. Mr. Bradley, lounging on his stool, arms folded across his chest, looked like the high school athlete watching the class nerd volunteer to stay and clap erasers.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Forget this column’s plagiarism and its inaccuracies. We have always been struck by this column’s unashamed lack of humanity. The “Corey” to whom Collins refers was a young woman who asked a question at this town hall debate—a young woman who had a very sick child. As several other pundits did, Collins ridiculed Gore for the simple decency of inquiring about this woman's sick child—although, of course, she forgot to explain that this was what Gore had done.

Keeping with a mandated theme, Collins told us that Gore had popped that question to Corey because he was trying to be like Bill Clinton. That passage has always struck us as remarkably heartless stuff.

Like everyone else, Collins trashed Gore very hard this day, sticking to a remarkably narrow play-list of standard group observations. (Essentially, everyone was plagiarizing Jacob Weisberg's bizarre review of this debate.)

The amusement came four days later, by which time the polling was in.

Surprise! New Hampshire Democrats who watched the debate thought Gore and Bradley had both done well. Anyone without an agenda could have seen that, of course.

As a result, this horrible person went on CNN and executed a perfect flip. Four days later, with the polling in, this horrible person said this:
WOODRUFF (11/2/99): When you look back at last week's town meeting with Gore and Bradley, how did they come across?

COLLINS: You know, I thought— I actually tend to think Gore did better than a lot of people did at the time. He seemed real energetic. He seemed to really care. He seemed to really want people to like him. And voters, I think, like that sense that a politician is really trying to please them.
Incredible, isn’t it? But Collins has been a mess for years, though you’ve never seen anyone say do. People, it just isn’t done!

(As a matter of professional courtesy, Judy Woodruff didn’t mention the fact that Collins had trashed Gore's clownish performance only four days before.)

Back then, for twenty straight months, Collins and her crowd worked very hard. They recited reams of standard group claims. There was nothing too dumb or too mean to recite about the anointed successor to Clinton, the man who had enjoyed those ten disturbing blow jobs.

In the end, they sent George W. Bush to the White House. Fourteen years later, this horrible person is still around, playing the twice-weekly clown.

The Way We Are is quite pathetic when people like this get a pass.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On Birmingham’s most famous Sunday!
    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 What two ministers said: Yesterday was the fiftieth anniversary of Birmingham’s most famous Sunday. As many peop...
  • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
    SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2013 What should the Post have written: Kevin Drum almost always loses us when he starts talking semantics. This doesn’...
  • The end of an era at the Times!
    FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2013 After the Dowdism crept: This memoir in yesterday’s New York Times reads like a bit of a parody. It ran on the f...
  • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 Forgets to tell us how much: Remember when dentists would recommend sugarless gum to their patients who chewed gu...
  • Roxane Gay mocks “wealth porn” in the Times!
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Then quickly breaks our hearts: According to Nexis, the term “wealth porn” does not enjoy a rich history. Wit...
  • The laziness of the New York Times!
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2013 Adam Nagourney, lounging around in L.A.: Very few women hold office in Los Angeles city and county government. By ...
  • Hanna Rosin corrects an inaccurate claim!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 We liberals decide to fight back: Last Friday, Hanna Rosen corrected an inaccurate claim—an inaccurate claim tha...
  • The Times reports why Christine Quinn lost!
    FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 Nobody cares about issues: Yesterday, Gail Collins tried to explain why Bill de Blasio rolled to victory in this...
  • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
    MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 The two Australian miracles: There are certain facts you hear all the time. Other facts which are very basic will g...
  • Lawrence interviews Anthony Weiner!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 The end of the human race: Last night, Lawrence made us think of Norman O. Brown again. Brown, a well-regarded ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (80)
    • ►  June (78)
    • ►  May (79)
    • ▼  April (82)
      • Joel Klein’s latest pitch, featuring Charlie Rose!
      • Extending our themes for the coming year!
      • David Brooks, describing Paul Krugman!
      • THE PROFESSORIATE FAILS US AGAIN: No one checked R...
      • Tsarnaev beat: Mainstream journalists love writing...
      • Why not support the folk who are right!
      • Breaking: Stanford professor reveals real facts ab...
      • THE PROFESSORIATE FAILS US AGAIN: Harvard professo...
      • Just this once, we’re letting you ask us!
      • Days of Bush: Manufactured all the way down!
      • As a matter of fact, the answer is yes!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: At several junctu...
      • The analysts have never been to New Orleans!
      • The New York Times’ best letter ever!
      • Walsh’s nut-picking got even worse!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: Our blue tribe de...
      • Beinart wants to make you like him again!
      • As the fourth “annual” fund-raising drive turns!
      • Breaking: A striking report from Dagestan!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: Sirota’s point wa...
      • We’re asking for your overwhelming support!
      • The problem with surveys of us the people!
      • The absence of the intelligentsia!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: Red and blue figh...
      • Breaking: Most of the adults couldn't play Blickets!
      • The glories of untrammeled income transfer!
      • Were four Republican senators brave?
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: We’re all the sam...
      • You can’t buy votes with earmarks now!
      • Breaking: The happiest time of the year is upon us!
      • Why can’t Obama be more like President Douglas?
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Public schools meet man...
      • Public editor praises the work of the Times!
      • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
      • Four lessons learned by Chris Cillizza!
      • Kevin Drum explains the senate two-way!
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Reporting the gaps whil...
      • Update: Why weren’t 54 votes enough?
      • How did a minority of senators kill an important b...
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Slick disinformation ab...
      • Testing now, instruction next year!
      • Innocent children around the world!
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Professor, professional...
      • What ought to be done with the Gosnell flap!
      • Did Patriots' Day provide motivation?
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Our nation’s ongoing st...
      • Bieber and Cohen regarding Anne Frank!
      • It happens many springs!
      • We’re going to say that George Will got this right!
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Mehta sees mediocrity!
      • Chris Hayes says he can’t understand!
      • Direct from the Cherry-Pick Hall of Fame!
      • Ralph Branca passed an important test!
      • This crap has gone on for a very long time!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: The things we know!
      • Harris-Perry is right because Limbaugh is wrong!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: Blunders and bloopers concerning g...
      • Nothing to look at! Just keep typing!
      • How much does Newark spend per pupil!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: Professor entranced by a child wit...
      • Can’t even get the simplest things right!
      • What Gene Robinson said last week!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: The professor’s big fail!
      • Maureen Dowd has come a long way!
      • Arianna Huffington, then and now!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: Them the journalists!
      • A bit more background on Kind Hearted Woman!
      • A superb documentary, right on your machine!
      • Who cares about the Atlanta schools!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: The Washington Post flunks a fea...
      • What happens on the first day of school!
      • Lawrence just can’t quit Mr. O!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Thomas L. Friedman expounds on t...
      • Goofus and Gallant on Goldstein!
      • Carrying us back to old Virginny!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Specialists try to discuss publi...
      • We keep waiting for Krugman to turn the corner!
      • The nation’s top superintendent gets charged!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Sisters’ fact at the Washington ...
      • Breakfast with Auden during Nam!
      • John Lewis discusses the way he grew up!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Our own Ben Carsons!
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile