thedailyhowler

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 8 April 2013

Arianna Huffington, then and now!

Posted on 08:51 by Unknown
MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2013

The way your career pundits function: Last week, Barack Obama made a joking remark concerning the fact that Kamala Harris is conventionally good-looking.

As a general matter, men shouldn’t make such remarks in professional settings. By now, you’d almost think that liberals would understand why.

Many liberals do not.

Over the weekend, we were struck by some of the liberal men who complained about the reaction to Obama’s remark. Jonathan Capehart just didn’t get it, of course. And this is what Bill Richardson said on yesterday’s Meet the Press:
RICHARDSON (4/7/13): You know, maybe I’m a Neanderthal, but I thought the president’s comment was harmless. It was a political speech. He talked about her accomplishments. He talked about her competence. And then he threw in that line.

You know, you’re at a political event, what are you going to read, her resume? So my point is this—You know, political correctness has reached the point where it’s out of control.

Am I going to be criticized, for instance, if I say that a movie star like Scarlett Johansson is beautiful? Are they going to go after me? Probably.
“She’s not the attorney general,” Andrea Mitchell instantly said, stating a blindingly obvious point.

For ourselves, we think a liberal man has hit rock bottom when he complains about “political correctness” in a matter like this, when he wonders if “they” will come after him if he makes such a remark.

That said, there is no doubt of a second point. Reaction to a comment like this will often be artificial. The pundit corps is constantly looking for something of minor consequence, but high interest, to blather about on the TV machine. On This Week, it was sad to see George Will elevated to the place where he made this obvious point.

Obama shouldn’t have made the remark. But when he did, many of the usual suspects were eager to use it to get through the night—or the early morning. Having said that, let us also say this:

The analysts came right out of their chairs when Arianna Huffington sounded off about this matter on This Week. Arianna thought it was time for everyone to calm down:
STEPHANOPOULOS (4/7/13): Arianna, should everybody relax or did the president really make a mistake here?

HUFFINGTON: Everybody should relax. Lighten up. It was an aside. It's unbelievable. George and I were talking in the green room about the G. K. Chesterton quote, "If there is one thing worse than the modern weakening of modern morals, it's the modern strengthening of minor morals."

Mock outrage. I mean I wish there was more outrage about the jobs numbers than there was about, than we had about Kamala Harris.
“It was a fun story,” Greta van Susteren instantly blurted, reminding us that millionaire pundits persistently want to have that.

Arianna was outraged by all the mock outrage; she wanted to hear discussions of substantial fare. She couldn’t even bring herself to allow that Obama actually shouldn’t have made the remark. And this brought the analysts right out of their chairs.

They recalled the disgraceful things this Big Pundit Loudmouth once said, at a time when she didn’t choose to relax. Back then, she spoke as part of an all-star panel on Rivera Live, Geraldo's nightly CNBC program:
HUFFINGTON (11/9/99): When you are talking about a consultant that you bring on to give opinions on how to dress and whether you're an alpha male and how do you become a beta male, frankly—

You know, what is fascinating is that the way [Candidate Gore] is now dressing makes a lot of people feel disconnected from him. And there was this marvelous story in one of the New Hampshire papers saying, “Nobody here, nobody here in Hanover, New Hampshire, wears tan suits with blue shirts.” You know, it's just—and buttons, all four buttons. You know, it's not just—it's just not the way most American males dress.
This person loved mock outrage then.

In fact, there were no suits with four buttons. Beyond that, we never found the marvelous story which said no one in Hanover wears tan suits, although the piece may even exist, given the lunacy then existing all through the mainstream presws. Beyond that, the “alpha male” talking-point was bullshit. So was the earlier complaint Arianna had voiced this night, in which she complained, over Al Franken’s rebuttal, that the Gore campaign was paying Naomi Wolf too much.

Wolf and Gore had both denied the unsourced claim that Wolf was telling him how to dress. No one contradicted that on the record, but Arianna's mock outrage was high.

Candidate Gore wore no suits with four buttons. But other pundits were complaining that Gore was wearing suits with three buttons. Making her comment stand out from the pack, Arianna bumped it to four.

In case you still don’t understand, this actually is the way George W. Bush reached the White House. People are dead all over the world because Arianna, and many others like her, just wouldn’t stop that relentless bullshit, with all that phony outrage.

Arianna was full of death-dealing outrage that night. But no one will ever challenge her on it. She will never be asked to explain why she kept saying these things.

The career liberal world has agreed to pretend that that history doesn’t exist. The relentless comments of the Ariannas and the Frank Riches have been airbrushed away.

Arianna was a disgrace that night. Today, though, in a startling flip-flop, we’re told that it’s time to relax.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • On Birmingham’s most famous Sunday!
    MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 What two ministers said: Yesterday was the fiftieth anniversary of Birmingham’s most famous Sunday. As many peop...
  • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
    SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 2013 What should the Post have written: Kevin Drum almost always loses us when he starts talking semantics. This doesn’...
  • The end of an era at the Times!
    FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2013 After the Dowdism crept: This memoir in yesterday’s New York Times reads like a bit of a parody. It ran on the f...
  • The Times tries to blow the whistle on docs!
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2013 Forgets to tell us how much: Remember when dentists would recommend sugarless gum to their patients who chewed gu...
  • Roxane Gay mocks “wealth porn” in the Times!
    THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Then quickly breaks our hearts: According to Nexis, the term “wealth porn” does not enjoy a rich history. Wit...
  • The laziness of the New York Times!
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2013 Adam Nagourney, lounging around in L.A.: Very few women hold office in Los Angeles city and county government. By ...
  • Hanna Rosin corrects an inaccurate claim!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 We liberals decide to fight back: Last Friday, Hanna Rosen corrected an inaccurate claim—an inaccurate claim tha...
  • The Times reports why Christine Quinn lost!
    FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 Nobody cares about issues: Yesterday, Gail Collins tried to explain why Bill de Blasio rolled to victory in this...
  • The types of facts you will and won’t hear!
    MONDAY, AUGUST 26, 2013 The two Australian miracles: There are certain facts you hear all the time. Other facts which are very basic will g...
  • Lawrence interviews Anthony Weiner!
    TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 The end of the human race: Last night, Lawrence made us think of Norman O. Brown again. Brown, a well-regarded ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ►  August (70)
    • ►  July (80)
    • ►  June (78)
    • ►  May (79)
    • ▼  April (82)
      • Joel Klein’s latest pitch, featuring Charlie Rose!
      • Extending our themes for the coming year!
      • David Brooks, describing Paul Krugman!
      • THE PROFESSORIATE FAILS US AGAIN: No one checked R...
      • Tsarnaev beat: Mainstream journalists love writing...
      • Why not support the folk who are right!
      • Breaking: Stanford professor reveals real facts ab...
      • THE PROFESSORIATE FAILS US AGAIN: Harvard professo...
      • Just this once, we’re letting you ask us!
      • Days of Bush: Manufactured all the way down!
      • As a matter of fact, the answer is yes!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: At several junctu...
      • The analysts have never been to New Orleans!
      • The New York Times’ best letter ever!
      • Walsh’s nut-picking got even worse!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: Our blue tribe de...
      • Beinart wants to make you like him again!
      • As the fourth “annual” fund-raising drive turns!
      • Breaking: A striking report from Dagestan!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: Sirota’s point wa...
      • We’re asking for your overwhelming support!
      • The problem with surveys of us the people!
      • The absence of the intelligentsia!
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: Red and blue figh...
      • Breaking: Most of the adults couldn't play Blickets!
      • The glories of untrammeled income transfer!
      • Were four Republican senators brave?
      • RED AND BLUE WITH RACE ALL OVER: We’re all the sam...
      • You can’t buy votes with earmarks now!
      • Breaking: The happiest time of the year is upon us!
      • Why can’t Obama be more like President Douglas?
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Public schools meet man...
      • Public editor praises the work of the Times!
      • Presenting the filibuster challenge!
      • Four lessons learned by Chris Cillizza!
      • Kevin Drum explains the senate two-way!
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Reporting the gaps whil...
      • Update: Why weren’t 54 votes enough?
      • How did a minority of senators kill an important b...
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Slick disinformation ab...
      • Testing now, instruction next year!
      • Innocent children around the world!
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Professor, professional...
      • What ought to be done with the Gosnell flap!
      • Did Patriots' Day provide motivation?
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Our nation’s ongoing st...
      • Bieber and Cohen regarding Anne Frank!
      • It happens many springs!
      • We’re going to say that George Will got this right!
      • MEDIOCRITY ALL THE WAY UP: Mehta sees mediocrity!
      • Chris Hayes says he can’t understand!
      • Direct from the Cherry-Pick Hall of Fame!
      • Ralph Branca passed an important test!
      • This crap has gone on for a very long time!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: The things we know!
      • Harris-Perry is right because Limbaugh is wrong!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: Blunders and bloopers concerning g...
      • Nothing to look at! Just keep typing!
      • How much does Newark spend per pupil!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: Professor entranced by a child wit...
      • Can’t even get the simplest things right!
      • What Gene Robinson said last week!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: The professor’s big fail!
      • Maureen Dowd has come a long way!
      • Arianna Huffington, then and now!
      • THE WAY WE ARE: Them the journalists!
      • A bit more background on Kind Hearted Woman!
      • A superb documentary, right on your machine!
      • Who cares about the Atlanta schools!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: The Washington Post flunks a fea...
      • What happens on the first day of school!
      • Lawrence just can’t quit Mr. O!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Thomas L. Friedman expounds on t...
      • Goofus and Gallant on Goldstein!
      • Carrying us back to old Virginny!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Specialists try to discuss publi...
      • We keep waiting for Krugman to turn the corner!
      • The nation’s top superintendent gets charged!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Sisters’ fact at the Washington ...
      • Breakfast with Auden during Nam!
      • John Lewis discusses the way he grew up!
      • GATEKEEPERS DOWN: Our own Ben Carsons!
    • ►  March (69)
    • ►  February (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile